October 3-4, 2017, Oxford, England at the Oxford Spires Hotel
Registration now open! via Eventbrite
£125 for 2 days of talks, lunch & refreshments
CauseHealth takes on the challenges related to causal complexity, individual variations and external validity in health sciences. Guidelines, for various reasons, are often used more rigidly in clinical settings than the developers intended. But one size does not fit all. Evidence from the patient context can be more causally relevant in deciding treatment than what has been shown to work at the group level.
This conference brings together practitioners, guidelines networks and philosophers of science to address the general problem of how to put the tools of philosophy to use in improving the development and implementation of healthcare guidelines.
In particular, how do we reconcile the purpose of guidelines with the needs of the clinic? There is a growing movement towards the particular (e.g. person centred approaches, individualised treatments, incorporating patient narratives and clinical judgement), while guidelines must be general (e.g. providing evidence-based advice and methods for clinical decision-making).
Specific topics include questions about how guidelines should meet the challenges of:
- Individual variation
- Complex illnesses
- Multiple diagnoses from common symptoms
- Investigating the mechanisms underlying the onset of illnesses
- Amalgamating evidence from the medical literature with patient’s narrative
- Moving beyond the empirical ideal of value neutrality in medical research
- Integrating a whole-person, patient-centered view in evidence-based health care
- Finding the space for experts and patients ‘implicit knowledge’
We aim to reach a wide, interdisciplinary audience of medical researchers, practitioners, guideline developers, philosophers of medicine, communicators and patients.
Expected learning outcomes include:
– critical perspectives about the evaluation of evidence in medicine;
– insights on the amalgamation of different types of evidence;
– insights on the type and quality of evidence regarding biological mechanisms;
– important background considerations for designing of clinical experiments;
– critical considerations about the boundaries between value judgements and empiricism in medicine;
– important background considerations for clinical use of guidelines.
TUESDAY 3 OCTOBER:
9:30-9:45 Rani Lill Anjum, Introduction
9:45-10:45 Trish Greenhalgh, Desperately Seeking Personalisation: How evidence-based guidelines sometimes produce non-evidence-based care
11:00-11:30 Session 1 : Challenges in Development– Integrating Knowledge through Collaboration
Beth Shaw & Sietse Wieringa, Appraising and Including Different Knowledge in Guidelines – GIN AID Knowledge Working Group
11:30-12:30 Mike Kelly, Empiricism, Reductionism, Linearity and Value Neutrality in Guideline Development: a realist alternative
1:30-3:00 Session 2: The Evidence Challenge – Understanding Mechanisms
Karin Engebretson, Suffering Without a Medical Diagnosis
Sarah Wieten, Manageable Mechanisms: how confounders make amalgamation difficult
Elena Rocca, Evaluating Evidence of Mechanism
3:30-5:00 Session 3: Challenges in Practice I – Keeping the Person Whole
Anna Luisa Kirkengen, From Wholes to Fragments to Wholes — Is Something Lost in Translation?
Brian Broom, Getting Real in Whole Person-Centred Healthcare: the challenges in actually doing this stuff
WEDNESDAY 4 OCTOBER:
9:00-10:00 Opening Keynote
Nancy Cartwright, TBA
10:15-11:15 Session 4: Challenges in Practice II – Where do the Values Come in?
Minna Johansson, ‘Informed Choice’ – no panacea for ethical difficulties
Stephen Tyreman & Bill Fulford, Choosing Together: From Informed Choice to Dialogue
11:30-12:30 Session 5: The Challenge of Implicit Knowledge
Elizabeth Matovinovic & Samantha Copeland, Implicit Knowledge and Explicit Guidelines
Fiona Moffatt, The New ‘Normal’? Professional sense-making and evidence based guideline
1:30-3:00 Session 6: The Guidelines Challenge – What’s in a Guideline?
Alex Broadbent, Judges or Robots? Medical expertise in the guideline era
Hálfdán Pétursson, The Validity and Relevance of Guidelines for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease for General Practice
Stephen Mumford & Rani Lill Anjum, A Philosophical Argument against Evidence-based Policy
3:15-4:30 Session 7: Meeting the Guidelines Challenge – Round-up and deliverables
Roger Kerry (plus panel)