One size does not fit all

Reflection by Elise Arnaudo on N=1

oslo 2

Ås, photo by Elise Arnaudo

The N=1 workshop has been a great occasion to reflect on two crucial questions: where does medical evidence come from? and what kind of evidence is useful in clinical practice? This topic has been addressed in a multi-perspective framework, with the participation of clinicians and philosophers. The discussion has been intense and rich and, in my view, it has also witnessed the fruitfulness of the dialogue between medical practitioners and philosophers.

sole rising

Ås, photo by Elise Arnaudo

The debate has focused on the meaning of two claims written also on the beautiful workshop t-shirts: Statistics don’t get me and, my favourite one, One size does not fit all. The last is particularly adequate to represent the case of MUS, which are emblematic of the N=1 problem. As already highlighted in the first CauseHealth meeting, the resistance of MUS to standardized approaches is probably due to the fundamental role that the patients’ experiences play in these condition. But MUS are not an exception and neither is their marginalization in medicine, as emerged in several talks at the workshop: in the EBM model, complex chronic conditions do not fit, likewise pregnant women in clinical trials, and psychiatric patients’ voices in the DSM. What in EBM lacks is the complexity and the specificity of the individual, and this makes medical action less effective.

 

 

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s